In the last class Prof. Mandi brought 2 things to class.
Today I am going to discuss about those 2 things & how they are related to
organizational management.
The first thing was a piece of magnet. Actually we were back
to our school days when we used to get excited to have a magnet. We were
testing the magnet’s magnetism by touching it to each and every possible thing
in our class. Now let’s hear about the concept that how it can be related to
management. The idea was that the magnet can be compared as a leader. The
magnet is a type of person who can influence other people & as a magnet
causes a movement to a static iron piece, the influencing manager can get the
best of the worst.
This type of
manager can get the best out of his/her subordinates. These managers have very
good relationship with workers & he/she has great understanding about their
strengths & weaknesses.
Also he brought few structures having equal no. & same
size of balls attached to it. Now we have to join the structures & finally
it looked like an organizational pyramid. The pyramidal shape of a company's
organizational chart reflects a hierarchy. Executives are at the top of the
chart; middle management follows; and lower-ranking employees are at the
bottom.
There are three main types of pyramid organization
structures: functional, product and matrix.
The point of views
that came from students about the structure were-
It is symmetrical so everyone can change their
roles as per requirement.
All the balls are of same size. So everyone has
same importance on the structure.
There structure has different layers & it
can be compared with organizational hierarchy.
The base layer or the worker class is providing
support to the whole thing. So it can’t be ignored & have to be strong for
company’s progress.
The other possible
structure that can be made was flat organization. This type of organization is
good for a small group of people. But the structure has less no of contact
points than pyramid structure.
Organizational
structure dictates how work is divided in a company. Small organizations may
have a relatively flat structure, especially newly formed companies. However, a
company's organizational structure will become pyramidal in shape as more
employees are hired.
Benefits
- An advantage of a functional organization
structure is that workers are divided by specific professions.
For example, advertising professionals work
together in the same department, as do finance employees.
- Work can be easily coordinated in a
functional organizational structure.
- The advantage of a product organizational
structure is that all efforts emphasize ensuring product quality.
For example, a vice president of women's
clothing in a department store can focus all efforts on building sales for one
product line.
- Matrix structures combine the benefits of
both functional and product organizational structures, especially for
short-term projects.
Disadvantages
- A major disadvantage of a functional
organizational structure is that coordination between different functional
areas can be difficult.
For example, marketing may have difficulty
knowing what the finance department is working on.
- A drawback of the product organizational
structure is an overuse of resources.
For example, five marketing managers may
work for five different product departments.
- In a matrix organizational structure,
employees may experience dual reporting.
For example, a marketing coordinator may
need to report to both marketing and a product development manager.
Also there was a session by some of our senior batch students. And I feel very proud to say that in their 2nd year of college they have started a company based on gifting "Rakhi" online.The website is
http://gift-rakhi.com/blog/. They discussed about the problems they faced but how they overcame those. It was a learning experience.They also inspired us to do something similar.
Overall it was a learning experience as always.
Thanks for Reading.
Regards
Arnab Mukherjee
PGDIM-20